The pro se plaintiff says: "jury verdict certified", because he wants to transmit the idea that it can't be appealed, and the conservator would say that it has no other option than to disburse the amount that would allocate a fat bonus to the corrupt attorneys, estimated in $180 million (a cut of 30% of the total $600 million awarded) that, likely, in turn, will be allocated to all the attorneys in all the cases participating in the Fanniegate scandal since 2013. Their prime felony is stock price manipulation sustained during 10 years and you need many participants that come and go, unless you are this pro se plaintiff that has a free pass in the D.C. courts, allowing him to file a new lawsuit every time that one gets dismissed, and with the DOJ attorneys always playing along.
Like the dividend declared in 2008 in Fannie Mae, but not paid on the day of conservatorship. Despite the Restriction on Capital Distributions covered up by the attorneys in court nowadays, it was finally disbursed arguing that it was "an outstanding obligation to be honored". It was "certified", right?.
Anyway, the fact that the jury's award and the Plan of Allocation have nothing to do with the actual damage claimed in court (one-day share price drop the day of the 3rd amendment), blows the whole jury trial up, as commented yesterday. Attempt to give back dividends to a Non-Cumulative dividend stock and to pay the attorneys for their con job.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
