The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has agreed to remove social media posts and webpages that urged people to stop taking ivermectin to treat COVID-19, according to a settlement dated March 21.
The FDA has already removed a page that said: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.”
Within 21 days, the FDA will remove another page titled, “why you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19,” according to the settlement announcement, which was filed with federal court in southern Texas.
“The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals,” the page currently states. It also says that data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19, despite how some studies it cites show ivermectin is effective against the illness.
The FDA in the settlement is also agreeing to delete multiple social media posts that came out strongly against ivermectin, including one that stated: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.”
In exchange, doctors who sued the agency are dismissing their claims, the filing states.
“FDA loses its war on ivermectin and agrees to remove all social media posts and consumer directives regarding ivermectin and COVID, including its most popular tweet in FDA history,” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, one of the doctors, said in a statement. “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”
“We are extremely pleased with the outcome of the settlement as it is a victory for every doctor and patient in the United States,” added Dr. Paul Marik, chief scientific officer of the FLCCC Alliance and another plaintiff. “The FDA interfered in the practice of medicine with their irresponsible language and posts about ivermectin. We will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’”
An FDA spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email that the agency “has chosen to resolve this lawsuit rather than continuing to litigate over statements that are between two and nearly four years old.”
Police Forcibly Remove Doctor From Hospital After He Endorsed Ivermectin: Full Footage | Facts Matter
“FDA has not admitted any violation of law or any wrongdoing, disagrees with the plaintiffs’ allegation that the agency exceeded its authority in issuing the statements challenged in the lawsuit, and stands by its authority to communicate with the public regarding the products it regulates,” the spokesperson said. “FDA has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.”
Ivermectin was approved by the FDA in 1996 to treat several conditions, including onchocerciasis, a tropical disease caused by a parasitic worm.
In the United States, it’s common for doctors to prescribe medicine off-label, or for a different purpose than the one for which the medicine is approved.
After some doctors began prescribing ivermectin for COVID-19, the FDA ramped up its campaign, including the Aug. 21, 2021, post on Twitter, now known as X.
Dr. Bowden and two other doctors sued the FDA, arguing the agency’s actions went beyond its authority, as conferred on it by Congress.
U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown dismissed the case in 2022, ruling that the FDA did not act outside the authority. But an appeals court in 2023 ruled in favor of the doctors, finding that the agency “has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine.” Between the time of the ruling and the settlement, the FDA refused to change any of its statements on ivermectin, and asked for a fresh dismissal of the suit.
The Case
Drs. Robert Apter, Bowden, and Marik brought the case in 2022. They said they suffered repercussions after prescribing ivermectin to patients with COVID-19, and that the FDA was to blame. Dr. Apter, for instance, said that pharmacists refused to fill the prescriptions, citing the FDA.
“This refusal delays his patients in obtaining their prescribed treatment—when early intervention is paramount—while they look for a pharmacy to fill their prescription, if they can find one at all,” the suit states.
He also said that insurance companies were refusing to pay for ivermectin to treat COVID-19.
The suit said the FDA illegally interfered with the relationships between the doctors and patients. The doctors said with regard to ivermectin, the FDA overstepped the authority conferred on it in the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Government lawyers argued that the FDA was acting within the confines of the law, and succeeded in getting the dismissal.
Judge Brown, appointed under President Donald Trump, said the FDA’s powers were only limited with regard to medical devices.
“As there is no statute limiting the FDA’s actions here, it cannot have acted outside of any statutory limitations,” he wrote in his ruling. “Further, it cannot be said that the FDA had no colorable basis of authority. The FDA is charged by Congress with protecting public health and ensuring that regulated medical products are safe and effective, among other things.”
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit disagreed, finding that the law did not authorize the FDA to give medical advice.
“FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine,” U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, appointed under President Trump, wrote for the court. The appeals court remanded the case back to the district court.
ELECTION FRAUD & BROKEN LAWS Exposed In Maricopa County, AZ! NEVER Brought To The Courts! Help Us HOLD KARI LAKE & ABE HAMADEH Accountable & DEMAND They File A RULE 60B6 + Our Evidence To SET ASIDE The ’22 Election & Take Back America! Save My Freedom with Michele Swinick
“What They Did in October 2020 Was Treason…We Told You Biden Was Illegitimate and the World Knows It” – Steve Bannon on Xi, Putin and Iran Having Their Way with Biden By Joe Hoft Mar. 20, 2022 1:05 pm199 Comments
Obama, Clinton, Biden and Brennan will “hang for treason” when this evidence comes out… BOMBSHELL recordings prove they had Seal Team Six EXECUTED to cover up deep state crimes 10/13/2020 // Mike Adams // 68.3K Views
In This Article: MMTMF $Monument Mining Monument Mining Monument Mining
$Revenue of US$11.00 Million and Cash Cost of US$894/Oz
VANCOUVER, British Columbia, March 01, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- $Monument Mining Limited (TSX-V: MMY and FSE: D7Q1) “Monument” or the “Company” today announced its second quarter of fiscal 2024 production and financial results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2023. All amounts are expressed in United States dollars (“US$”) unless otherwise indicated (refer to www.sedar.com for full financial results).
Stock Screener: Ep. 390: $Monument Mining (MMY.V): Q2 Fiscal 2024 Earnings Albert S 6.9K
19,000 ounces Produced, 15000 ounces Sold Imagine what this mine will do when fully tuned to capacity ..
tdate, the flotation plant has produced over 16,000 tonnes of concentrates at a grade of 37 grams per tonne gold.
( 16,000 tons times 1.2 ounces per ton = 19,000 ounces valued at $45 m in CAD
Shipments have been made to three separate buyers, and negotiations continue with several potential new customers.
To date, over 12,500 tonnes of concentrate have been delivered to Johor and Port Klang free zones.
( 12500 tons times 1.2 ounces per ton = 15,000 ounces worth $37 million in CAD
Export permits have been renewed with the relevant state authorities as required
. Transport of the latest delivery of 3,500 wet metric tonnes to Port Klang free zone has been completed with vessel to depart in mid-January, 2024.
( 3500 tons times 1.2 ounces per ton = 4200 ounces worth $11 m cad
Sale of a further 3,000 tonnes of concentrate currently available has been finalized, and shipment preparation of the concentrate to the port is in progre
3000 tons times 1.2 ounces per ton = 3600 ounces worth $9 milliin cad
Add it all up.
We are coming along a bit slower than expected but we are well into robust cash flows and increasing our cash balance by nozzpackon Jan 19, 2024
$Murchison Historical Resources The Murchison portfolio contained historical resources of - 644koz at the time of acquisitions. Monument is systematically performing all the necessary work to convert and validate these historical resources into current resources under NI43-101 guidelines. A breakdown of the historical resources is detailed in the table below
NI 43-101-Indicated Resources 293 koz Au NI 43-101-Inferred Resources 88 koz Au Historical Resources** 644 koz Au