InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jonesieatl

02/26/07 6:04 PM

#112510 RE: jonesieatl #112504

EDOQ, here it is:

(snipped from the FT.com article billybass just linked us to)

=====================================================
"However, Mr Kindberg said the more competitive mobile communications markets that exist in other countries make it harder for agreement on technology to emerge in these places. “It’s been on the verge of happening for some time now – the technology is there, but the problem is the fragmentation in the market.”

The HP/Publicis group, known as the Mobile Codes Consortium, hoped to reach basic agreements on technology within a year, he added.
======================================================

jonesie
icon url

EDOQ

02/26/07 8:06 PM

#112523 RE: jonesieatl #112504

jonesieatl, I wasn't implying that trading was a bad thing,

I was wondering if you still were trading NEOM. As with most of the posters here you can sense what their position is regarding ownership of NEOM,long, short, pumper, basher, etc... by the substance in their posts.

I always new you traded stocks because you have admitted as much many times. I wish I had the "skills". (appreciate the charts btw) In recent months your "substance" has changed noticeably, not that it's any of my business. At the same time you have picked up the habit of throwing "old posts" into peoples faces, so I thought I would read some of your old posts. That's when it hit me, you are still trading this stock.

So now that you tell me that your not trading NEOM anymore, I'm confused, certainly you can't consider yourself a "devils advocate", maybe you do.

Whatever, sorry to ramble on, it doesn't matter beyond my own curiosity. FWIW, I am long NEOM, and I don't trade, only because I'm not good at it.

icon url

EDOQ

02/26/07 8:12 PM

#112524 RE: jonesieatl #112504

jonesieatl, "p.p.s. Something I just read in that article billybass linked to, well, I want to figure it out, apparently a MC2 person was quoted as saying something like 'we hope to have a standard created within the (or 'a') year'. Is that the timetable? If so, we've got nearly a year, or more, for patent judgements, and possibly a year before this MC2 consortium could help 'us' out."

The Market looks ahead, we should start to climb in price throughout the year as news develops re: MC2, lawsuits, licenses,
dare I say partners or possible buyout. Yes or no?