Replies to post #22014 on NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
2m

$NLST Here is the link to the doc (screenshot) from my previous post— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.73.0.pdf

Also dropped in 294 & 293 is an Order to compensate the Special Master.
294— https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.74.0.pdf

https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565924591.png

[justus1]

Thank you!

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
Yesterday 9:38 PM

$NLST I hope it's clear that I did not describe/state each motion's ruling, nor did I state which parties motion it was, I only referenced the names of the motions—which could be Netlist's or Micron's—and who won on the motion. Kind of confusing, but I was limited by Stocktwits character limit, and chose to format that way.
For example—and it would be obvious upon reading the doc—Consolidate & Pre-Suit Damages went for Micron, meaning no Pre-Suit Damages for Netlist and no Consolidation for Netlist... even though as written in my post it seems that I said Pre-Suit damages were expected, I meant the result... same as to Consolidate, which is in the Micron win column, not that Netlist can Consolidate.
Another example is Netlist win on Noninfringement of 912 & 417 patents... which is Micron's motion, hence listed in Netlist win column by name which can seem there was no infringement.
Anyways... I think you get the gist.

the post referred to....... https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/565922351