Never said it was new. Just a well researched article that points out how these paid pr firms infiltrated message boards with fake credentialed aliases. Brings to mind a "doctor" that posts often on this board.
Why would you focus on the date of the article vs the point of the story? You guys are living and breathing based on the words of the fraudulent CEO of the past. You'll gladly accept that old news, but not stories about paid pumpers? I wonder why you wouldn't want to know that someone is on here being paid to lie to you to get you to hold your stock?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
