InvestorsHub Logo

hole-in-one

03/13/24 9:17 PM

#73767 RE: skitahoe #73766

The drone part of the corp is under epaz correct? Then they shouldn’t be able to branch out into another entity (zena) without taking Epaz with it correct? I would think that would be illegal. Who knows in the otc! I’m a novice trader, but I do know you can not go to the nasdaq when your shares are in the hundredths of a penny. I have seen where the company has said no reverse, but it only makes sense that to being able to advance to NASDAQ under Epaz, a drastic change HAS to happen. Where does that leave us?

PoeseidonXXX

03/13/24 9:18 PM

#73768 RE: skitahoe #73766

It won't even have 20%. That's my opinion,
Honestly I don't know how much, something will have to have, but it's going to be very miserable in the percentage that will be earning.
The management is waiting for what the reaction will be and that's how they'll decide.

Everything is well planned to defraud the stockholders. I don't think it's this Just legally.

SkyPilotUSA

03/13/24 9:22 PM

#73769 RE: skitahoe #73766

The 5 million in revenues were epaz... so it seems there rebranding epaz to zena. If epaz has a contingency with a VC firm and/or institutional Investors and/or the USGov contract in place pending Nasdaq listing for x amount of ZenaDrone per month... that would be great. We're all speculating... let's hear what is going on from the company... soon I hope.

Financials are going to add to the story...out soon Nasdaq will need the 2023 Financials with Attorney Letters before the listing...is APPROVED!!!