Replies to post #21674 on West Coast Ventures Group Corp fka WCVC

[Trend22]

WCVC - I’m sure you hit it low. Not a bad risk when you think about the possible multiples if it trades again. Good luck to you!

[PennyHoper]

To BrownRickRoss re Canada and other things ...

First, an apology if my previous post that replied to you (re T53) seemed to come down hard on you personally. The posting software only allows 15 minutes for edits, and on minute 16 I realized that it probably came across that way. (It was a long day, with no opportunity to post earlier, and I was on my way to bed at minute 17.)

It's valid to question whether any prediction 'can be trusted,' just as it's valid to question a weather prediction. However, your post was within a chain calling T53 a liar (questioning whether he was purposely not being truthful), where motives, not methods were the issue.

I appreciate your posts, so again, I apologize for making my post a reply to you rather than something stand-alone.

Second, re Canada -- do you happen to know anything about Nixon Restaurant Group in Canada? I don't know anything about it other than that some database lists it as existing and has a 'current' status.

Third, you asked Jason: "Do you think he would sell the ticker to a custodian that can reverse merge with a new company?"

Can you explain more about who such a custodian might be, why Nixon might want to do that, and then what advantage the reverse merge would have over getting caught up on filings and etc? [I can guess about that last one, that it would be similar to why Nixon did a reverse-merge in the first place, but I tend to assume others always know more than I do, which is usually the case.]

When Nixon moved West Coast Ventures Group Corp to Florida the day before its revocation was posted on Edgar, the filings (actually the amendment) shows that it had the same share structure as it had in its previous location (NV, I think, although always run from a CO office). Turning your question into statement of strategy, how would that fix -- or in some way address -- the share structure for those who hold common shares now? Or is the idea simply that it would be a relatively cheap way to get back to trading, where current share-holders would hope its return to trading would be enough to 'put wind in its sales'?