Replies to post #20866 on GBT Technologies Inc (GTCH)

[canthelpit]

gtch,,,, yes some where in there is sept date i saw ,, not saying i read whole thing just saw something about 6 month extension ,,, even that might be promising since no mention of not being able to consumate the deal,,, i am long here espcialy at theese pps,,,, a click or 2 adds alot of zeros if you accumilated eoungh of the 1's,, the tech is superior if it is what they say,,,,, the avant! video is misleading as well ,,, states using the tech for a few years and during peak of covid,, as well as stating danny rittman as a founding father,,think that might have been a slip ??,, hmmmmm

[bucks2pennies]

IT, I try to think of it this way....try this, if you like it, buy it...or return it.

In the IT world, trying it can take many years! Only recently has AVAI and BNIX become a reality. All concerned with BOTH continued using GTCH/Tokenize technology as they developed.

BOTH are now nearly past 'trying' and now willing to implement their own mechanics with GTCH tech most assuredly imbedded in such mechanics. Thus the need to pay GTCH for their part in the development. The contracts are means by which AVAI and BNIX pay GTCH/Tokenize. All negotiable and time consuming until ALL parties sign on the dotted line.

Problem is now is not only is GTCH/Tokenize, AVAI and BNIX involved in the negotiation but there is a new kid on the block - THE BUYER OF GTCH/TOKENIZE.

Because AVAI and BNIX have taken so long in 'trying' and finally willing to 'buying' - GTCH/Tokenize went on their own course as well. NOW they have chosen to sell GTCH/Tokenize in whole. NOW all the necessary 'signing' has taken a much lengthier road. SHs have no choice but to wait longer now.