Replies to post #21908 on NetList Inc (NLST)

[100lbStriper]

Stokd
3:05 PM

$NLST It's become very convoluted.
"The law of the case likely requires a finding for Netlist on the issue of breach if the jury adopts Netlist’s interpretation of JDLA § 6.2. (See MSJ Order 9–10, ECF No. 186 (“Samsung does not dispute that it declined to fulfill all of Netlist’s orders for NAND and DRAM products.”).) But the Court is aware of no agreement between the parties that the breach issue must be resolved in Samsung’s favor if the jury refuses Netlist’s proffered interpretation. As Samsung’s first proposed verdict question is framed, Samsung submits that it must win the case if the jury answers the question in the negative. But answering the question in the negative does not mean that the jury accepted Samsung’s proffered interpretation."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565055933.png