InvestorsHub Logo

selfactualize

03/04/24 8:14 PM

#67116 RE: Lakota-45 #67115

Lakota-35 when the liquidity event occurs what can we expect the pps to go. I am assuming money earned due to the event the 5-10% generated would translate to equivalent pps. Can you shed some light on this.

saj

03/04/24 8:24 PM

#67117 RE: Lakota-45 #67115

Lakota glad you brought that up have not heard Ken make any promises.

Your post:

However, having said that: It became abundantly clear to me awhile back, that
some folks here, just don't understand the difference between, . . .
1-) A statement of Anticipation, bases on current information that might
change or delay, the anticipated timeframe of completion !
2-) An actual statement of fact !
3-) And: A Promise !

My feeling is when Ken and his team deliver what some of us choose to anticipate
we will be happily rewarded for our patience.

Wrangler1

03/04/24 9:40 PM

#67119 RE: Lakota-45 #67115

Statements of anticipation. Thats a new one. Call it what you may, Ken has not delivered on the things that he said he was going to deliver on in the time frames he said he would deliver. It’s semantics. He bull shits his way through things. If he does not execute two liquidity events in Q1, Ken once again will be proven a liar. See you are already laying the groundwork for the inevitable miss on the two liquidity events we are all anticipating. Glad you give a damn how I feel. I don’t expect you to.