Yeah, just like WNFT reaching "the promised land" for WNFT "worked."
The name change is the promised land and we are now ready to entertain mergers.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) July 8, 2022
The "equity stake in multiple blockchain companies" BS should be believed as about as much as his tweet saying he would get GVSI SEC registered and reporting, that he would refile GVSI's SEC Form 10 registration statement two Decembers ago and never did, saying that WNFT had reached the "promised land" and would have a "business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s)." that never materialized in September of last year when he said it would and saying he would not reverse split GRDO then did just that.
During the SEC review it was discovered that the designation of a class of pref shares issued by $GVSI's previous management is missing. On the SEC's advice, management has decided to withdraw the Form 10 and refile in December so that corrections can be made with the Nevada SOS. https://t.co/MhVwRI4NW1
The name change is the promised land and we are now ready to entertain mergers.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) July 8, 2022
The mandatory settlement conference did not yield an agreement with Calasse, however we anticipate that $WNFT will proceed with a business plan over the next several weeks which will include an acquisition(s). This statement should not be construed as a guarantee for success.
There will be no reverse split, dilution or toxic debt taken on so long as I am involved with $GRDO. Update filings will reflect a zero balance sheet. PRs are forthcoming.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) October 5, 2018
I regret giving the impression that $GRDO would not r/s, but unfortunately, it was the only way to get things done. Why would the shareholders want as much as 800 million shares in dead certificates? The only purpose that serves is to make it more expensive to raise money.
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) August 9, 2019
I will never be involved with a company that wipes out the shareholders through a reverse split. $FORW$TSNP
— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) November 2, 2020
Notice that Sharp again said that he would never reverse split any of his stocks when he had already reverse split GRDO. Is that being honest?
Yet Sharp cult members keep saying "George is honest." I just showed otherwise.
...and the Sharp cult members keep lapping the BS up as they see their losses accumulate.
You don't have any idea what is going to happen - so far Sharp hasn't done anything of value. When you base your investment strategy from posts and Twitter(X) posts - you will will always lose your investment.
"We know it’s not a reverse merger. We know it’s equity stake in multiple blockchain companies."
You absolutely don't know that Sharp has any Blockchain companies - the question becomes what does GVSI have to offer a real company - the answer is nothing. Why would a successful private company have any interest in a OTC company that doesn't report to the SEC and hasn't filed a 15c?
Sharp brought 2 companies into FORW as assets and both were scams. So, I wouldn't believe anything Sharp says.
Why don't you ask Sharp why it will take another year to file a Form 10 for GVSI?