InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Tenderloin

11/12/03 11:19 AM

#50704 RE: SSI #50701

SSI

I am not disagreeing with your conclusion. Below, is an earlier post of mine on the subject. Also, after seeing the Gateway player even I could figure out it was an e.Digital based product.

Posted by: Tenderloin
In reply to: MaryinRed who wrote msg# 50679 Date:11/12/2003 10:50:39 AM
Post #of 50701

I do not believe RP EVER directly mentioned Gateway. He responded to questions about revenues/royalties, etc., by stating this is the first deal talked about in the Sept. PR outlining the new HDD player, and the Asian OEM........

Now having said that, I understand how any reasonable person could put 2 plus 2 together and get Gateway.....

icon url

murrayhill

11/12/03 1:25 PM

#50743 RE: SSI #50701

"How else can one interpret this?"

Whoaaa. Trading on insider inuendo? I mean, if you follow the flow of info, a female edig employee tending their street scene booth said that there was a Gateway/EDIG JB in the works, way back in September. No public acknowledgement from Headquarters. Pictures show remarkable similarities as do specs. Only a complete putz wouldn't conclude that edigital is involved in the Gateway PJB.....but no public notice from the company. Putnam supposedly exchanges the referenced emails with ssi. No PR, as of yet.

If there is money lying on the table, take it. Congratulations to all of the emotionally detached smarties who did.