InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

fung_derf

02/21/24 10:08 AM

#229782 RE: Monroe1 #229780

It's funny you now talk bad about the past CEO considering even after the news of his fraudulent statements came out, you still defended him (again, your history is easy enough to read here).
I've never in my life shorted a stock and I certainly wouldn't start with a penny stock that can only drop 16 more cents. I could have easily shorted SMCI after the big run up, again, easy enough to read my posts predicting the fall at $1000 a share.....but I didn't.
And for the TWO HUNDREDTH time, I couldn't care less if people with no common sense aren't listening to me. Typically people see the light when its too late. However, if I'm preventing any newbies from making dumb decisions based on your posting alone, then I'm quite happy.
Therefore, the reason I'm here is because posters like you are. People need to know about your "stock picking acumen".
icon url

janice shell

02/21/24 3:02 PM

#229800 RE: Monroe1 #229780

You know the FDA is much more friendly now as the Feds have investigated AmarX and Nada Nader for collusion. Will Nader tell all? No, not to the public. They will cut a deal and the Iranian duo will get off much lighter that expected probably only having to serve a little time and paying a nice fine to cheated investors. Looking forward to how they shape this scenario for public consumption.

The SEC and the FDA encourage companies not to "shape" scenarios. In addition to that, the matter you describe is not trivial, and will cause many to distrust the company for years to come.

That is how it works.