InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

RealDutch

02/15/24 4:10 AM

#8776 RE: karlacorn3 #8774

Karlacorn, you know the situation perfectly well. The company does plan to pay quarterly dividends. Even monthly dividends at some point.

Does it really matter whether they pay 2 dividends in March/April? No it doesn't. Besides, they already increased the dividend from $0.15 to $0.25. And people need to stop complaining about the $0.01 they (had to) pay for the tokens. When the company is paying a quarterly dividend of $0.08333 on these. When the tokens could easily be worth $10 or more. It's hilarious.
icon url

snow

02/15/24 6:35 AM

#8777 RE: karlacorn3 #8774

karlacorn I disagree with you. The verticals represent a technology that has not been used extensively so far even, if it is being taken into more and more use. My experience over 50 years is that venture companies are extremely risky. During the 1980s I was on the board of a venture company that was listed on the stock exchange in my country. About 90% of the companies we invested in failed totally.

Based on my experience as an investor over 50 years I regarded the verticals as very risky. But we paid very little for our tokens. Therefore the risk/reward ratio looked very good even if it to me looked like a very risky investment. I go for high risk/high revard. I therefore invested about 7,500 dollars in the 9 verticals, which turned out to be how much I was entitled to invest. I have noticed that the transfers of the rice tokens has increased to an interesting level this week. I think that this is a suggestion that at least some of the verticals will not be total failures. It will be sufficient for our investment in 9 tokens to be a good investment if just one of the 9 verticals is a moderate success. If one of them is worth 20 cents we will do well.