Both sides presented arguments, judge requested they provide their written legal arguments from both sides in 60 days, no more then 60 pages. Then they have 30 days from then to respond is how I read it.
Purdue is saying this is different
Accord saying no it's not and you just rehashing what was already ruled against.
Both sides have their technical experts who have already testified previously. Purdue seems to contradict themselves a bit
That's my free legal analysis. I did stay at a holiday inn last year ..so....