InvestorsHub Logo

JohnnyHydrogen

02/07/24 9:18 AM

#58411 RE: fsulevine #58410

fsu - here is a link to FCEL document. Page 9 talks about the MWs necessary for different types of power plants.

https://go.fuelcellenergy.com/hubfs/Carbon%20Capture%20with%20FuelCell%20Energy%20Systems.pdf

My understanding of natural gas power plants is that 500 megawatts is pretty standard for 'large scale', however I believe that 100 megawatts has been discussed as a new standard for the CCS related projects.

From this document, as far as I can tell, a 100 MW Natural Gas power plant would require 30 megawatts of FCEL fuel cells. So that is approximately the 10 or 12 units that you alluded to. I think that is a minimum for these 'full scale' projects. Coal plants will have even more.

Maybe I am wrong about how to interpret this document but this is my understanding.

Hoghead7

02/07/24 10:14 AM

#58414 RE: fsulevine #58410

If I recall that Steve I would have commented on it. I just don't recall I'm not saying it's not accurate. I do recall Exxon Mobil commenting on how many different facilities they have which the technology could be used at. I do believe that within 5 years people will laugh at why the stock was ever near $1, And anyone insisting anything ridiculous like reverse split bankruptcy or sub $1 is going to look more ignorant than what they already do. Unless the world makes a major turnaround regarding carbon Capture and hydrogen production in 2024, there is no stopping this company. There are the most proven company on the market. They've worked with the governments in the UK and the US for many years. The way I look at it there are fuel cell companies and there's fuelcell energy. The Navy Toyota in Exxon Mobil agree. That says it all. What scientists do Walmart and Amazon have? Lol