InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

jdcpa1

02/06/24 6:37 AM

#76843 RE: snow #76840

Sorry snow, when someone tells me they are smarter or have more knowledge than others that's usually BS.. They said profit margin and it doesn't matter how you want to spin it. You stated gross profit margin. They never stated the word "gross".. keep spinning and show us how intelligent you are..You have been a buffoon on this topic since the 1st contract was announced like your some expert and started stuttering when they tweeted they command an 18% profit margin. lol

If you have some superior credentials tell us what they are.. I doubt they are a pimple on my arse but I am not here to brag. I will however point out your BS...
icon url

shotsky

02/06/24 7:59 AM

#76847 RE: snow #76840

I think Park's statement about the 18% margin was 'loose lips', and people in this chat room jumped on it like chickens after worms. I knew immediately that an 18% profit margin was out of the question, since competitors could come in at half that and still be profitable. I still hold that net profit will be in the 1-2% range.
We will simply have to wait and see from filings what the actual net profit is. And that will be different for each business segment. Anything else is blue sky guesses.
I'll be 80 next week. Two old coots!
(Loose lips because he had no idea that people would jump all over the statement and immediately assume it was net profit.) Park is not yet wise in the ways of penny stock boards, but I bet he will be a bit more circumspect as a result of this 'slip'.