InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Freddie bagholder

02/03/24 9:26 PM

#784971 RE: The Man With No Name #784958

The day the news hits it goes from $1.25 to $12.5
Deal with it.
icon url

trunkmonk

02/03/24 10:15 PM

#784973 RE: The Man With No Name #784958

Too bad the Ps and and hate filled goons in gov and watching 24/7 are clueless. Freaks.
icon url

bradford86

02/03/24 10:30 PM

#784974 RE: The Man With No Name #784958

Question — for you

In your opinion— if the warrant value can be used politically, do you see the possibility that the government officials in the WH pursue the path that maximizes their value and allocates the proceeds to housing infrastructure grants?

Can the government extract $100b in warrant value while simultaneously zeroing out existing common?

Like can they convert spspa and then exercise warrants? Is there an ordering requiring them to exercise the warrants before converting the spspa or thoughts there?
icon url

Wingsjr

02/04/24 7:07 AM

#784990 RE: The Man With No Name #784958

Dilution gets FnF nothing, FnF don’t need a capital raise, they have more cash than the original bailout. They make 10’s of billions a year. There’s already been a win for shareholders of 600+ million which will be revised up by Lamberth. The NWS was illegal and that will give government cover when they have to give back the 301 billion minus the bailout. There is no court in the land that will rule the money paid by FnF doesn’t count as paying down the bailout. The 600+ million win proves that.
icon url

kthomp19

02/05/24 6:03 PM

#785186 RE: The Man With No Name #784958

Bravo.

This is the kind of post that should be stickied, but since it goes against the echo chamber it never will be.

Caveat emptor.
icon url

nagoya1

02/05/24 6:56 PM

#785192 RE: The Man With No Name #784958

I am a chicken wearing dentures. Fnma