As I've said, whatever happened or didn't happen in 2013 doesn't matter, due to the statute of limitations. The only legal issue that the court cares about, involving actions taken in 2013, is whether the shares were issued fraudulently or not. If there is not extrinsic evidence of fraud, at issuance, then the shares are outstanding and legit.
That's why I think the court cares more about actions taken by Sharp in 2022, which you've conveniently labeled "extremely minor details." Except they're not, if the court lacks jurisdiction to cancel shares, that's an extremely major detail.
I think your understanding would be improved if you didn't just regurgitate buzzwords and actually tried to understand them. There was an SEC registration statement, the issue in Caledonian was how the previous CEO took steps to abuse the process. Calasse wasn't part of that, but you don't seem to care.
And no value received for shares is an allegation made by Sharp. There is a signed stock transfer agreement available on Edgar, and Calasse took possession of the stock certificates as they were registered in his name. That's clear evidence of value received. If you meant by GOFF, then the statute makes clear the debt just needs to be repaid, you can't cancel the shares. If anything they should be sold on the open market and Calasse would receive the remainder after the debt was paid to GOFF.
My 2 cents.....overturning the lower court I believe is difficult but it happens. I think the scales lean our way but shit happens, either way hope it over soon. Good gamble loading up here .