You don't have any proof that Sharp made a generous offer to Calasse other than a post on Twitter.
"Calasse could have had MILLIONS of dollars at the peak and shareholders could have made out okay back in 2022, if he would have just accepted Sharps very generous initial offer. There was in fact a merging asset ready to go public at the time, no doubt in my mind. NFTs were just peaking out and it would have been a good time for a public offering."
You don't have a single fact that can be independently verified that Sharp had a merger lined up - that is more pinkyland wishful thinking.
Post your proof that Sharp made very generous offer to Calasse - and that Sharp had a merger lined up.
Sharp has been the CEO of FORW for 5 years and he has never brought in a real company - and in those 5 years Sharp still hasn't generated any revenue.
Are GOFF/WNFT shareholders so naive/gullible to believe that if Sharp had a merger with a real company he let the Calasse lawsuit completely stop all business operations - so what you are saying is that Sharp is a incompetent CEO. As any competent CEO would have never allowed the Calasse lawsuit to stop the merger.
The Calasse lawsuit is a insignificant bump in the road. But Sharp never had a merger lined up and used the Calasse lawsuit as an excuse.
And the yammering about Calasse being involved in fraud the SEC didn't think he was involved in any fraudulent activity and here is proof from when Sharp filed a Form 10.
Here is the proof:
"2. We note your disclosure with regard to the treatment of shares held by Warwick Calasse as treasury shares. Please provide your analysis as to why these shares should not be treated as issued and outstanding.
Response: We have revised our disclosure to treat the Series A preferred issued to Warwick Calasse as issued and outstanding and to make clear that Mr. Sharp has retained control of Goff Corp. through the issuance of 5,000,000 shares of Series A preferred and 1,000,000 shares of common stock."
So the SEC smacked Sharp around for attempting to steal the Calasse stock.
Calasse hasn't caused shareholders any pain and suffering - this is all on Sharp. As he is one of the worst CEOs on the OTC.
What is funny you posted that the SEC was demanding a response from Calasse concerning an 8-K from 2013.
But the SEC filed a Amended complaint about Caledonian Securities in 2015 and Calasse was never named as a defendant. So you are playing fast and loose with the facts and timeline.
It has been hilarious that Shareholders have blamed Calasse for all of the ills of the company and are too scared to hold Sharp accountable for anything.
Why don't you ask Sharp why he hasn't filed a 15c for GOFF/WNFT, GVSI and SRNW?
Don't be scared Homey - ask Sharp!
IG
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
