InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

NeoSunTzu

01/16/24 3:39 PM

#782144 RE: TightCoil #782142

Trust me, you are swimming in waters too deep for your skills. I was thoroughly familiar with your Google board posts before you came here. It's great to be a cheerleader for all things GSE positive, but this Lockhart "proposal" is fraught with ambiguity. The media is not designed to capture the complexities and nuances of what these guys say, do, or propose and, the smart ones, like Lockhart are purposely ambiguous because it suits their interests. Lockhart is much more than a government policy wonk. He is thoroughly embedded in the Wall Street fabric through owning companies, mergers, equity stakes, advisor roles, and on and on and on. These guys do NOT have current shareholder interests in mind; they are looking to influence the next sweet deal either for themselves or cohorts on the street. he was formerly Vice Chairman of WL Ross & Co, which manages $9 billion of private equity investments, a hedge fund and a Mortgage Recovery Fund - he definitely wants an IPO or some sort of related Wall Street driven transaction. Read up a little on him and tell me if you think he is looking our for you or my interests.

Oh, and one more thing, leave the ChatGPT apps alone they're not helping you.
icon url

philipmax

01/16/24 5:09 PM

#782168 RE: TightCoil #782142

'Sub not necessarily traded' GREAT POINT! That is the game plan that i missed because Lockhart said that he wanted to have the Subs 'traded' but, that is the ruse to get the GSes out of C!