Replies to post #16235 on NanoLogix Inc (NNLX)

[yman]

DP: Based on your thinking shareholders can either (1) do nothing and own shares of 0 value or (2) support ant and have no shares and then 0 value. I'm no math wizzard but 0 in one case is no different than 0 in the other. Let this get settled in the courts and shareholders will still end up with 0. Hopefully Bret, Faro's and Chatterton end up with 0. Share the pain. If ant has any integrity and ends up with the patents and he keeps his word shareholders might have a chance. IMO

[Omar8]

What has BB done for you lately ?




You hate Ant so much but what has BB done for you lately ? Any updates to what's going on or plan going forward ? Has he even sent a message out countering Ant's claim of the company being void ? Anything ?




Look at these from the release in late 2021... any of them come to be ? If they had increase sales from Flatpack would there be an eviction ? Did you see any FDA registration on anything ? Did they pay that fee to keep the trading status the way it was ? You think Ant is out to do you wrong but has BB done you right ?




"Those three events present challenges for NanoLogix. We are dealing with those in the following ways:



1) With the reopening of many schools, we are prepared to increase FlatPack petri production to satisfy rebounding market demand.



2) We are also preparing for FDA Registration in January 2022 in order to be authorized to sell to laboratories and other groups that use Petri plates for testing samples under FDA regulated conditions. The FDA registration will list the FlatPack, our currently produced product, along with the ELISA variants of the N-Assay and RVA technologies.



3) After discussions with the OTC, and determining they will not accept independent SEC filings in order to restore NanoLogix to tradable Pink Sheet status, we will begin providing OTC with financials, and accept the burden of a $10,000 yearly fee. This is required to restore the Company to tradable status.

[Omar8]

DP,


"YMan , I understand the logic you are using however if ant is successful he will not, in my opinion be sharing his bounty with share holders.....Now you have basically worthless share value but you do have shares. If ant is successful taking over the assets of Nanologix then in my opinion you will have neither shares or value..........He is not doing this to salvage shareholder value as he states " he owns no shares ""


You don't understand logic you just demonstrated it here. Full of misinformation. You're a misinformation machine !