InvestorsHub Logo

EternalPatience

01/05/24 8:16 AM

#780962 RE: Rodney5 #780958

He is very good in responding to polite questions. Why don't you post in his blog and get this thoughts? It may be another DNU kinda stuck-in-a-limbo so give something that belongs to other over so that my JPS get par quickly kind of thinking. Please do ask. He responds to sensible posts. He only blasts folks like Bradford in general

The Man With No Name

01/05/24 9:53 AM

#780981 RE: Rodney5 #780958

Mr Tim Howard Quote: “I honestly don’t see any issue where a new claim, brought by a plaintiff with standing and the wherewithal to finance the suit, and that is not time-barred by the statute of limitations, has a realistic chance of being successful.”



Well he got that right. About time. Now all his followers need to figure out the same.

jeddiemack

01/05/24 8:09 PM

#781066 RE: Rodney5 #780958

Sorry, I too favor most of Howard's writing and opinions. But, by far anyone that advocates for the theft of personal property like Pagliara and Howard do not represent me and are counter to the good values of Americans and what it stands for.

kthomp19

01/10/24 10:06 PM

#781576 RE: Rodney5 #780958

I have a ton of respect for Mr Howard, I personally believe he is wrong pushing the exercise of the warrants.



He isn't pushing the exercise of the warrants. He expects Treasury to exercise them. Stop confusing expectation with desire.

Is a weather forecaster who predicts damage from a hurricane on the horizon "pushing" for the hurricane to hit land? No.

The above is one example of many that explains the problem that has lasted 15 years. Will the so called experts ever apply the law?



Evidently not without a lawsuit forcing them to. Your move.