InvestorsHub Logo

Wise Man

12/23/23 3:09 AM

#779000 RE: Rodney5 #778967

Boy! Quit saying that there are "regulatory guidelines" prohibiting dividends, pro se plaintiff Joshua Angel.
It's a statutory provision in the section "Prompt Corrective Action" of HERA, that inserted it in the FHEFSSA, entitled: Restriction on Capital Distributions, U.S. Code §4614(e):
1- Any dividend and today's SPS LP increased for free.
2- Stock buybacks and redemption of Preferred Stocks.
3- The payment of Securities Litigation judgment in the Lamberth court.

With exceptions: like the reduction of Preferred Stocks (exception B) while increasing capital in the same amount (exception A. With the Net Worth increase, FnF increased the Common Equity in the same amount as the reduction of SPS. Watch the image below) and, in the July 20, 2011 Final Rule (coinciding with the time limitation of the Acting Director DeMarco), a recapitalization in a Separate Account (CFR 1237.12). External Position, a global pandemic.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's regulatory guidelines would have prohibited the companies form paying dividends to the Treasury while severely under-capitalized, but the FHFA suspended those guidelines


You don't believe your own lies with your more than 20 different aliases on this message board.

kthomp19

01/03/24 2:39 PM

#780749 RE: Rodney5 #778967

The FHFA freely admitted the companies were adequately capitalized; but Paulson intended to steal the companies and he took the companies over by theft.



It's not what you know, it's what you can prove in court. Until and unless a lawsuit is brought using your arguments, they are meaningless. And the only way to make sure a lawsuit gets filed is to file it yourself. Put your money where your mouth is.

Yes, the companies were adequately capitalized when they were put into conservatorship. Shortly thereafter, when Lockhart stuffed FnF full of non-cash accounting losses, they went balance sheet insolvent. None of that has made a bit of difference in court so far.

Therefore:



Therefore what? Your paragraph didn't advance any argument at all.