No. When FnF took those draws they were balance sheet insolvent, which would have triggered mandatory receivership 60 days later if they didn't restore net worth to at least zero. That balance sheet insolvency was the entire reason they took the draws.
What caused the balance sheet insolvency was nefarious accounting decisions forced on FnF by Lockhart. But that happened before the draws, not after.
The insolvency was caused by non-cash accounting changes.
And the money that came from the draws went to FnF.
I sure hope that last part isn't a reference to the "FnF were forced to buy toxic mortgages" myth that has reared its ugly head again recently.