InvestorsHub Logo

HokieHead

12/19/23 7:34 AM

#157387 RE: Hi_Lo #157374

I’ll stick with facts, not fairytales.

The Sharp/GVSI fallacies:
-Sharp abandoned GVSI
-The debt motion won’t pass
-Sharp won’t get OTCIQ access
-GVSI won’t get off the expert market
-Sharp sold his 20M shares
-GVSI won’t get pink current
-GVSI has 8 lawsuits/controversies
-Sharp awesome at 1 ticker, fail everywhere else
-Fairytale Sharp 4th ticker EVLI the best 😂
-Doctored and outdated tweets being claimed as “the story now”
-Price going to .005
-Meaningless lawyer links that have nothing to do with GVSI
-Cut/Paste meaningless parts of filings and twisting them in to complete fairytales

Fallacies
Fallacies are flawed, deceptive, or false arguments that can be proven wrong with reasoning.

It’s funny, the only GVSI fallacies are timelines for FINRA getting resolved and the merger on deck. Trying to address them as “issues” and “will never happen” but they all end up playing out and then those fallacies are quickly forgotten and don’t matter?

What a complete hoot!

Lime Time

12/19/23 10:38 PM

#157483 RE: Hi_Lo #157374

You haven't any clue. GVSI doesn't need a Form 10. It is Alternate Reporting Standard. The best status for any merger candidate on OTC Markets. TSNP was Alt Reporting and that gave the world record run of any OTC stock. Now we have the chance to do it again with GVSI.

You're long on WNFT, I feel very sorry for your broke ass. Never won an OTC pick in your life. Take advice from Hokie on this board and you'll prosper. You are a dumbass in believing your own fairytale DD. Can't fix stupid.
Bullish
Bullish