Replies to post #112085 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[Drmyke3]

here's the scoop with NEOM lawyer
after a few days of missing contact with each other.

Lawyer: we have a new policy for 30 days now under Regulation FD that all shareholders have access to the same info at the same time after what happened one month ago when there was "an isolated incidence"

( I think he's referring to Hangdog being given a shareholder's e-mail address and being asked to respond by NEOM to the shareholdser's e-mail to NEOM)(I wonder if that shareholder threatened a lawsuit since management gave him the same prompt attention that I got)

Lawyer continues: Regarding "your" e-mail to the company, we just wanted you to know that we are responsive to shareholders

Dr. Mike: I did not e-mail the company

Lawyer: I didn't want you to think that the company was unresponsive

long pause of reviewing his papers

finds a blog copy of class action lawsuit threat


"Chas had asked me to respond to you after attention was brought to him of class action law suit"

more confusion as lawyer shuffles papers

Dr. Mike " I was discussing one on some stupid blog on the internet"


lawyer: the company is unable to respond

Dr. Mike you have to follow the regulations...you have no choice


Dr. Mike: I never asked for a response from the company. Are you going to follow your policy and give the same information to all of the shareholders at the same time?

Lawyer: (confused)

Lawyer: The company is unable to respond

I thanked him and wished him a nice w/e

His tone throughout was of friendliness and then confusion regarding as to why he was responding to me when I had never contacted them

[RonMexico]

Not a matter of "if" but a matter of "when".