I've never said that I was compensated for writing articles for Paul Rosenberg. There was never any prior agreement, verbal or otherwise, that I would be compensated for defending mCig. After I wrote my final article in 2020 and shortly before Rosenberg left Bot's he gifted me some shares which I was restricted from selling for six months and needed to be converted to common shares before they could be sold. The various fees to convert them would cost about $2,000. I've never converted them but did pay tax on their value. Consequently, at this point it's been a net loss and it's unlikely I'll ever see a profit. See the following link...
As for my bias, yes I was biased for the company as an investor just as you were biased against the company, presumably because you lost money. But readers shouldn't confuse the company's lack of success with with the validity of your arguments. In your zeal to disparage the company, you, and your negative allies, repeatedly made false claims about the company and Paul Rosenberg that I refuted ("debunked") with facts. Many had to do with misinformation about Paul ripping off investors or claims about security regulations that were false. Here are a couple of examples...
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
