InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

marcis

11/28/23 9:03 PM

#154876 RE: Yolo #154870

Yes he would making bank on the knowledge going up with fluff tweets and taking it down

Rinse and repeat

IMO

Nevervhad a real revenue company in all his years


wouldn't have gone through the whole charade.



icon url

I-Glow

11/30/23 12:25 PM

#155185 RE: Yolo #154870

I don't believe the following is true:

"It doesn't really matter what the Financials were from 2008-2013, there is a known number of shares and known assets/liabilities as of the court discharge."

FINRA and the SEC don't care what is done at the state level - Sharp did a name change with the Nevada SOS and it was meaningless to FINRA and the SEC as they didn't recognize the name change.

It does matter with the 2008-2013 financials if FINRA has questions about them.

What real company is going to use GVSI as a vehicle to go public with a reverse merger when GVSI isn't a SEC reporter?

The SEC has been making it extremely difficult for Custodianship/hijacked shells because they are always used for insider enrichment. It has been over 2 years and GOFF/WNFT, SRNW and GVSI are still empty shells.

But the Tell is that it has been 4 months since Sharp filed for a name and ticker change. This is normally the easiest Corporate Action Request with FINRA. But Sharp hasn't had any success.

IG
icon url

wakeupdummy

11/30/23 2:55 PM

#155205 RE: Yolo #154870

your closing evaluation
hits the nail on the head.
not that there's anything wrong with that,it's the pinks. ;-)