Wow, trying to justify the "technology", when the whole premise of having a gold deposit larger than has been mined in the whole state of Nevada through its entire history (somewhere around 220 million ounces).......is sheer bullshit. It is a waste of time going through these exercises.
You may know low voltage electrolysis systems, maybe you don't. I don't care, it is irrelevant. There is no gold to begin with. Go use your electrolysis to clean something or recover scrap gold from electronics. For mining on the scale of hundreds of millions of tons of ore (which don't even exist), it is a silly discussion.
This is just another OTC mining scam, one of dozens I have witnessed in the last decade. This is one of the dumber ones, it is not even close to being reasonably possible.
One last thought: the claim of "green technology" is always a fatal flaw. Nevada gold ores are typically full of arsenic - no value, but a huge detriment for environmental permitting. What are you going to do with the hundreds of millions of tons of spent ores ("tailings") full of arsenic and other nasties? Do you understand that is one reason that feasibility studies often result in the determination that a mining project cannot make money? The cost of recovering the metal must include things like dealing with the waste products, long term monitoring of the waste piles and ponds, etc. Mining is a dirty business, and few ore deposits proceed to the mining stage because the economics don't work out. Where's the feasibility study? You cannot apply a value to in-ground resources without full exploration and a feasibility study......the SEC frowns on that very much. STAL is not going to be a listed company much longer with all the fraudulent bullshit they've spewed lately.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
