Replies to post #68331 on Mullen Automotive Inc (MULN)

[TenKay]

LOL…I am not worried about anything. I don’t own this POS stock.

Funny stuff.

If they want mass produce the Mullen 5 or 5 RS, they will need at least $1 Billion.

Which they will never get unless Michery wants to add another 5 “nines” to the 99.99% loss so far.

Ergo, there will never be a Mullen 5.

It was simply a prototype they paid $2 million to build so he could pump the stock.

[B RY]

Agree jag! I've said before...david is a marketing man that has plenty of experience with toxic financing. Robert bollinger is a design engineer that needed financing to hand build his wonderfully designed prototypes. There is an old saying..."every con man would like to find a straight gig". I'm not saying david is a con man, but his track record of previous public companies is not a pretty picture for the previous investors. I would like to see the prototypes of both companies put out as a finished product. Even if that happens, I do not recommend MULN as a good investment. Financing will always be a necessary evil as it is with almost all auto manufacturers. I don't think tesla stock would have done so well if not for Elon's diversity into space exploration. Years ago billionaire kevin o'leary said he loves his tesla car, but hates the stock. Perhaps he may have changed his mind since. MULN simply does not have that diversity effect. Most EV stocks have taken serious downturns that can compete with MULN's downturn. Look at Ford. Over 100 years after it's inception it still needs a great amount of financing to continue operations. I agree with kevin's viewpoint only with MULN instead of tesla...love the designs, hate the stock. But as we all know...time will tell! Make your own decisions and good luck to all.