Replies to post #67879 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[Yolo]

It's important to know when you're the teacher and when you're the student. In this case, you are not teaching anyone anything except how to be blissfully ignorant.

Back to your old ways, I see. Only agree with what you want to see... When you're so set in your ways, it's hard to learn from others.

The buyers there were covering their naked shorts, billions of shares borrowed from thin air.

So it's up to billions now? Wow. If you can explain how billions of naked shares can last for years (over two years for some), without any proof or FTDs, then I am confident you can get an extremely lucrative job at a hedge fund.

Note that I'm confident you'd get the job if you can explain it, I'm not confident whatsoever that you can actually explain it. Merely waving your hands and pointing to HMBL is not sufficient, document exactly how hedge funds can manage to not deliver billions of shares for 1-2 years without any failure to delivers being reported by buyers.

[FEARANDGREED]

Friction causes heat... But your rants are like watching a dog fu*k a bucket of water trying to make it boil.

Jesus Christ buddy... you talk out of your ass.

$WNFT

[I-Glow]

The naked shorting on the OTC is pretty much non-existent and very little shorting.

There wasn't any naked shorting on HUMBL - that is more pinkyland nonsense you keep posting.

The Series B conversions were the cause of the price dropping because of the massive dilution - there wasn't any naked shorting involved. The family members of Foote converted and dumped. If there was naked shorted HUMBL would be required to report it to the SEC and file an 8-K to inform shareholders and that never happened.

IG

If there was 500 Million shares of WNFT that was naked shorted that would cause WNFT to be on the Reg SHO Threshold List - but WNFT was never on the Threshold List.

[I-Glow]

Little pumper boy - you really are a clown.

"you don't seem to be able to accept how it was prevalent in the HMBL Series B common conversion for over two years. The buyers there were covering their naked shorts, billions of shares borrowed from thin air. They were not your unsuspecting retail and institutional investors who had no clue or desire to preserve their capital. Have we achieve this much?"

That shows your lack of knowledge of any type of shorting - if they were buying to cover the billions of shares that were naked shorted - why wasn't WNFT on the Reg SHO Threshold List - because you don't have any idea what you are yammering about.

LMAO "HMBL Series B common conversion"

The Series B Preferred Shares were converted into Common Stock.

You can never provide proof that those naked shorting HUMBL were buying the stock from those converting the Series B Preferred stock.

That is as delusional as when you posted you divined what Calasse was thinking. You are a pumping fraud.

IG