When an anonymous poster (KThomp) quotes legal sections, it does not matter if he is anonymous or not. The only thing that matters is whether his arguments are legally consistent. If they are, then the conclusions are objectively correct - no matter how much the "serious sleuth" whines about it because it doesn't fit his conspiracy theories.
A conspiracy theorist, on the other hand, cites legal sections and draws the wrong conclusions from them to "confirm" his pre-existing prejudices.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
