Reading comprehension? The guy posted blindly to the message board passive-aggressively implying "negative" comments are the work of criminal disinfo agents. I pointed out that being skeptical and looking for facts is not criminal conduct and the burden of proof lies with the accuser, not the accused. How is that, in any way, a lack of reading comprehension? I'm guessing fallacy is not your strong suit either.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
