InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nyt

10/24/23 6:48 PM

#125051 RE: prophet2 #125049

IMHO you are 100% correct in everything in your post, most especially the comment about what an insult the patience thingy is. I've been saying the same for a long time. That's exactly what it is....an insult. The way I see it, when anyone way over uses a word or a phrase, especially one that is patently wrong for more than 10 yrs in fact, then it turns that word or phrase into a negative and dirty word.
It also makes little to zero sense for a company and a ceo who is truly on the up and up and truly cognizant of and with a sense of responsibility to, his fiduciary duty to those who have supported his trip for all these years. That is just one of many reasons that since those dots don't connect, that I find something other than fiduciary duty and other than patents that are "ALL THAT", because then the dots connect and not just on that point but on many others as well. Frankly, when viewed as a setup whose intention is to be a personal ATM for insiders, those dots easily connect too and not just because I say so or some conspiracy theory kind of mindset, but it is exactly what we see happening right before out eyes with the undeniable selling like there's no tomorrow, when there is allegedly and supposedly good news on the horizon. Doesn't add up. Dots don't connect.

Oh, and there WAS an announcement of a settlement made right here almost 6 mos ago now, on 5/2 with a 45 day fine tune allotment and let's face it, NOTHING became of it. We got the ol, keep em in the dark and feed em shit treatment. We're on a need to know basis with an added clause that we have no need to know. The vaunted IR guy, according to a poster's info about a call he made, reported that he (IR guy) stated there was indeed a settlement and it was good for shareholders. That post is here to find and read. Yet, such a thing would presumably trigger as a significant material event and regardless of any alleged Nda's, should have, by law, been reported in an 8k and or the last 10q, to the best of my knowledge and I have done plenty of DD on it and even posted the sec rules on it which are clear as a bell. Again, dots don't connect, unless viewed as a big ol scheme. Then they connect. And the history of lord Emu has been one of failure and deception.

Oops I 4got....the only thing you were slightly off about is the fact that a few, definitely a minority, have been smart enough or lucky enough to not attach to another over used and obviously incorrect advice given many times by the self styled "super longs" or "true longs", about never selling your shares and never letting the enemy get them from you and all that pure hogwash. A few have made some profit.

Gee, look how much I wrote. Surely all that could've easily been condensed into 1 or 2 sentences as most of it lacks import and significance. Oh well...
icon url

Str8t-talk

10/24/23 7:38 PM

#125052 RE: prophet2 #125049

100% agree
icon url

fung_derf

10/25/23 10:01 AM

#125059 RE: prophet2 #125049

Not just IPR news or trial rescheduling news but real news like winning a Court proceeding, receiving something of value from a defendant or a buyout or settlement announcement.



So, I've thought about this, and the only announcement that would/should cause a spike is if the company has the patent on a product that isn't outdated or replaced. It would have to be something with future value.
Even if they were to get settlements from companies, unless they paid out a dividend to all shareholders, how the heck would you profit?
And IF they planned to pay a dividend, as ORCA so delightfully points out, they wouldn't be dumping shares daily.
Either way, diluting your stock value is hurting you guys in more than one way.