It sounds like you're navigating a complex situation WarMachine with SSOF's stock, management trust issues, and personal conflicts within investment circles. Investing in stocks often involves not just financial risk but also the challenge of deciphering management's intentions, the real potential of the business, and the influence of other investors or promoters. Here are a few thoughts addressing the aspects you've mentioned:
Management Trust and Company Prospects: If you have concerns about the current management based on past performance or behavior (like the water project that didn't materialize), that's a valid reason to be cautious. Company leadership plays a crucial role in the success (or failure) of ventures, and their track record can be a telling indicator. While it's true that people and strategies can change, skepticism is understandable without tangible evidence of improvement or successful ventures.
Dealing with Misinformation or Aggressive Promoters: The stock market can be rife with promoters who have personal agendas. If you've had negative encounters with individuals who are disseminating what you believe to be false information or personally attacking dissenters, that's an unfortunately stressful element to deal with. You're correct in that doing due diligence (DD) is vital. If someone has a history of fraud or misinformation, potential investors have a right to know, as it can impact decision-making. However, navigating these conversations can be tricky, and it's essential to approach them with facts and avoid personal conflicts as much as possible.
Personal Conflict and Communication: It's clear there's a history of animosity and personal conflict affecting communication and perhaps even influencing perceptions of SSOF. The sins of the father cannot be labeled upon the children and you’ve taken the road of guilty regardless whether or not they are progressing forward to build a company that offers shareholders possibilities. In these cases, as challenging as it may be, striving for professional communication that focuses on facts, records, and verifiable information can be more persuasive to onlookers and other investors. When arguments become personal, the core message about a stock's potential or lack thereof can get lost.
Future of the Investment: Your doubts about SSOF's new ventures are based on your experiences and understanding of the situation primarily from the past. If you decide to continue engaging with this community and stock, consider diversifying your sources of information, cross-referencing declared facts, and perhaps even reaching out to neutral third-party financial advisors who can provide a fresh perspective. If the environment becomes too toxic or the investment too risky, it might also be worth considering stepping back from this specific stock or community to protect your well-being and financial health.?
Investing is never just about the numbers on a screen; it's also about the people behind the companies, the communities discussing them, and the individual investors' peace of mind and financial security. All I am saying you’ve posted over 15,000 times and after digging I found little that was positive. Some could say you are the antagonist promoter or simply you have an axe to grind. Disgruntle former employee, perhaps you were involved with SSOF as a major shareholder. It doesn’t really matter because at the end of the day it’s about whether this new management actually does something significant to change the course. If they do I’d hope your opinion changes but the likelihood is nil.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
