You misunderstood me. I normally get what I'm told the 1st time. I understood everything you said perfectly. This excerpt from my post shows where I differenciated between Google and your link:
"But it sounds like the service you left the link for is solely there to explain court docs. In fact I should quit guessing about it and go check out your link see exactly how it works."
However, I had not yet tried the link and mistakenly got the idea that it was specifically geared to court docs. I have since looked closely into it and I now understand exactly what it is and had posted something about that. I also posted some info about the fallibility of AI and chatGPT. So you must have misunderstood me. I did not say it was Google. What I was trying to say in that post was based on you saying it (chatGPT) was like Google. I merely was saying I didn't know you could use Google for translating legalese (which I thought better of later). I was just alluding to your comparison to Google to help point out that your link was probably much better. See what I mean now? Then I said I would stop guessing and go check out the link. I did so right after and now am fully up on what it is, which is indeed same technology as google, ie, AI. Sorry if my choice of words threw you off.
Incidentally, there's a new PLUS version of chatGPT and chatGPT will not be staying free.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
