InvestorsHub Logo

Fannie Heyyyyy

10/15/23 9:28 AM

#770960 RE: camaro4me #770958

One problemo Cam-a-ro....Lamberth isn't going to rule with the jury. Sorry bro.

HappyAlways

10/15/23 9:37 AM

#770965 RE: camaro4me #770958

I like it, null and void.

Rodney5

10/15/23 10:08 AM

#770970 RE: camaro4me #770958

camaro4me, The key part is "Purchaser may, in its sole discretion". The Purchaser here is Treasury. It's safe to say that Treasury will never voluntarily choose to do that.

Fact of the matter the Treasury had the clause written in the contract. With this clause the Treasury can limit the amount of damages “In the event that any provision of this Agreement, the Senior Preferred Stock or the Warrant is determined to be illegal or unenforceable,”

The SPSPA is an illegal contract. The Charter Act passed by Congress is the law. The Plaintiffs will never win fighting the FHFA/Treasury on the wording written in the contract. These experts should focus on the numerous violations the FHFA/Treasury have committed against the law.