Circling back... yes it has badges, but that only suggests it is not toxic, not that the formula is functionally great.
I am curious how it came to be and what criteria was used to determine its claimed benefits and functionality?
Especially as no one on staff has any pharma or formal nutritional credentials.
This is not being negative. In order to gain real traction the product has to work, ideally with proven 3rd party evaluations.
At the very least, must have a grassroots following that affirms it's benefits?
This may already be in place but it's not reflected on the web site that i can see.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
