Replies to post #770310 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Guido2]

Thanks Vanmike. Saving your post. Will send the same letter to them in a couple of weeks as a reminder if there's been no visible action.

[Wise Man]

How many rabbits are you going to pull out of your hat, pro se plaintiff?
That letter represents only your thoughts and you want to pass it off as the opinion of the Ihub board.
Your opinion refutted multiple times, like here about the CFR 1237.12.

You are also accused of covering up key statutory provisions like the cheap UST backup of FnF in the Charter Act (redeemable obligations SPS), expressly written as a last resort ("the operations shall be financed by private capital to the maximum extent feasible)" in the section Purposes, and in exchange for their Public Mission set forth in that section, or even the coverup that the laws in force are the FHEFSSA and the Charter Act, as amended by HERA, not HERA alone, and also accused of conspiracy to rip off the shareholders, advocating the 10% dividend to UST (barred and unavailable funds for distribution of dividend, out of an Accumulated Deficit Retained Earnings account)

You don't even know that the dividend was suspended to build capital and currently there is a compensation to Treasury in the form of gifted SPS (a capital distribution restricted and Financial Statement fraud with these SPS absent from the balance sheets)

the ongoing senior preferred dividend payments

Finally, the "Lamberth rebate" is fraud in every aspect you can think of. From an illegal Class Action with the absence of the FNMA holders, the fiction of "implied contract", disregard of the laws, phony economic harm, etc. and epitome of corruption, as the payment of Securities Litigation judgments sought, is restricted in the same statutory provision that they've covered up from the onset, that also bars the dividends and today's gifted SPS, and whose exceptions are the grounds of the Separate Account plan:
-Reduce the SPS: U.S. Code §4614(e)
-Recapitalization: CFR 1237.12

And quit posting on this board and Yahoo's, under more than 20 different ID's.
You are an illusionist.

[Donotunderstand]

Thank you ----

I assume you will continue to help all of us

Might I suggest - for the next round - or anyone writing == the need to address head on the canard that ONLY and MOSTLY the injured are fat cat hedge funds !!!

So on suggestion - using the below copied material - two paragraphs

I write to address a longstanding concern that has negatively impacted Fannie Mae (FNMA) and Freddie Mac (FMCC) shareholders for more than fifteen years – the overreaching actions of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and the extended conservatorship. This issue has not only affected countless Americans but also has implications for the broader financial landscape.

In light of your exceptional insight into these matters, I am confident you are aware of the magnitude of the problem. The shareholders of FNMA and FMCC, that includes millions of American citizens who have invested directly or indirectly through mutual funds and pensions, have endured substantial financial losses. Families have seen their retirement savings, children's education funds, and future financial security erode as a consequence of these circumstances. Moreover, the actions taken have had a ripple effect, causing community banks to suffer losses due to government actions and misleading statements.

SUGGESTION: As a sentence-paragraph between the two paragraphs ? Or as a more "startling -direct" opening to paragraph two - raising the question --- that you answer ---

Who are these injured - abused shareholders ? I suggest a reader sees the question - maybe as its own one line paragraph

Then they will read the answer --- Americans of all stripes and incomes - all across the nation -- as it is more of a focus

Thank you for all your work