Replies to post #213752 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[IH Admin [Shelly]]

I'm not sure what point you're trying to link since this seems to be who that article is about:

For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

In any event @IH Geek [Dave] explained "Free Speech" in layman's terms many years ago. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=22909540

Investorshub is a company (private property) where as government land/holdings/buildings are what the 1st Amendment (which I believe was the original topic) applies to.

[Homebrew]

That's nothing to do with chat boards like IHub. Even if it were, there are plenty of boards here to choose from for any opinion.

[janice shell]

Your quote:

Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.

For the purpose of Section 242, acts under "color of law" include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official's lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

Does any of that describe the IHub admins? Didn't think so.