InvestorsHub Logo

LuLeVan

09/14/23 3:39 PM

#767969 RE: Guido2 #767967

I don't know how far the criminal energy has gone. Maybe you are right. But the Lamberth trial has proven that even under HERA payouts to shareholders are possible - and contracts have to be respected.

Patswil

09/14/23 3:52 PM

#767970 RE: Guido2 #767967

Reply from Hamish on Damage Interest Ruling ...
Booooom ! next update Brief is coming Sept 18th !

Copied from Navy Post#767577
**************************************************************************************
Hamish Hume
To: Ron Cc: Samuel Kaplan

Tue, Sep 12 at 6:41 AM

It will be fully briefed as of next Monday Sep 18. The parties dispute whether and how much,
so it is taking some time. After it is fully briefed, we will just be waiting for the court to decide it.

Hamish PM Hume Partner
BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
1401 New York Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
(o) +1 202 274 1149
(t) +1 703 328 9651

hhume@bsfllp.com
www.bsfllp.com

kthomp19

09/14/23 6:29 PM

#767999 RE: Guido2 #767967

You think government agencies that ignore the US Constitution are going to respect the jps contracts?



They did in the equal conversion offer in late 2020. If FHFA and Treasury truly believed that they could trample over the juniors' contracts they wouldn't have bothered making an offer to them at all.

Like it or not, commons and jps are in the same boat.



The juniors are on the deck while the commons are in the hold. The boat can take on some water, diluting those in the hold, without sinking.

Sinking = receivership anyway, which should be viewed as exceedingly unlikely.

One sinks, the other sinks too.



But you said there was only one boat!