InvestorsHub Logo

logic-commonsense

09/11/23 3:04 PM

#145445 RE: logic-commonsense #145443

To support what I am saying, here is an excerpt from the 7/08/2022 press release of WNFT. They are letting you know that they are in negotiations, but no merger is "anticipated" at that time; thus no need to include it on the SEC disclosure form you (or maybe HiLo) quoted for GVSI:

"About Worldwide NFT, Inc.

WNFT is now in discussions/negotiations to acquire assets in the NFT (Non-Fungible Tokens) and Blockchain space. NFTs can be exchanged or traded equivalently like other cryptographic assets as they are financial securities consisting of digital data stored in a blockchain, a form of distributed ledger. The ownership of an NFT is recorded in the blockchain, and can be transferred by the owner, allowing NFTs to be sold and traded."

Jayman5000

09/11/23 5:42 PM

#145453 RE: logic-commonsense #145443

You seem hell-bent on the February tweet being proof that a specific merger target has been in the works this whole time.

I maintain that the tweet is actually ambiguous enough if you examine it very carefully to absolve him of liability if things don't turn out the way perhaps implied.

And now months later the filing states that there is no merger anticipated and a search has not even started. Mind you, the filing does not seem to demand full details of any anticipated merger, perhaps only the existence of one, at the least.

If I am right then George has been perhaps a little fast and loose with wordplay but hasn't actually done anything wrong to the point of legal liability. Mind you, I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice.

If you are right then he has straight-up lied, either in the tweet or in the filing, because they are not in agreement with each other.

We're all adults here, well most of us; if you want to call George a liar then that certainly is your prerogative.