Replies to post #223975 on Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[kgromax]

Even FDA never wrote that the 82% mortality benefit above any other drugs , in critical is a wrong number ..
They never wrote this , as they would be lying about the easy to check results .

Oh the ugly ignorance.

What they did write is that statistically this number was meaningless. Because it was handpicked after the facts among hundred random numbers...

It's something a nurse cannot know but that is taught in 101 Statistics courses (for that, you need to go to Uni):
a number can be technically correct yet...statistically incorrect to infer any correlation. Because...it was handpicked after the facts among hundred random numbers to pump a fake positive story about Leronlimab (statisticians call this data dredging). And all the other numbers, the less rosy ones, have been hidden from the press release.

It's very easy to do. Let's take an extreme example to ease your understanding, the lottery example:
let's assume that you, Misiu, play 1 billion times a small lottery. Among these 1 billion attempts, you may probably win at least once the lottery. Let's pick that "win" and ignore the data dredging (=the 999.999.999 failed attempts). You choose to advertise this win in a press release, hiding the failed attempts. One ignorant reader of your press release will infer that Misiu wins every time she plays the lottery. Misiu is the Leronlimab of lottery games!!! Of course, that ignorant observer is wrong because he has ignored the data dredging, that is, the 999.999.999 failed attempts which prove otherwise.
So, a number can be technically correct (your lottery win) yet statistically incorrect to infer any causality (that Misiu always win the lottery).

But you know all of that. I have explained it hundred times in the past.

Yet, you pretend having never read this, and you keep repeating the same stupidity to lure more naive investors into this failed drug and scam company.
Shame on you