As usual, you donotunderstand. If NWS is a dividend, why are suits challenging it as a taking? If it's an illegal dividend, than challenge it as the net worth sweep dividend. Words matter to courts. They know it's not a dividend, hence all the justices referencing nationalization, why? They recognize that a net worth is NOT a dividend.
Which case, so far has challenged governments dividend? Specifically? I'll wait while you go through all the cases to only find that those which challenged
The net worth sweep
never said it was an illegal government dividend. Illegal taking, yes.
You and guywithnoname should put together your NWSD court case or illegal government dividend court case and see where that goes...they'll laugh at you. It says it was changed to the net worth of the companies, so they could never go public again. Once the government confiscated the net worth of a company, there's no such thing as a dividend.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
