InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

LittleBirdin my Ear

08/31/23 11:27 AM

#71323 RE: Goldenboy17 #71322

Appreciate your posts on this Board. I personally don't understand why people bash a stock unless they are Shorting said stock. SFRX is basically
Non-Shortable as such.
icon url

hedge_fun

08/31/23 11:48 AM

#71324 RE: Goldenboy17 #71322

The Juno claim a few years ago was that…….

the treasure was 5 miles from the ballast pile. That was your claim, Kyle simply said Judd had them looking in the wrong place.

Not sure why Judd would say or do that when Robert Marx told them where to look, and that is well documented.

Others added that the reason it was 5 miles away was because all the treasure fell out of a hole in the hull.

Then we get a new theory on the unidentified, yet “alleged” most valuable wreck in human history.

The ship sank and landed upside down, which is why there’s no visible cannons or treasure, and why the ballast pile is visible.

Add to it, that Kyle turned down an unnamed Fisher to partner on a wreck SFRX didn’t even own, and the Director of Operations at MFT wouldn’t be privy to the “alleged” most valuable wreck in human history, nor would it be discussed around the office.

Coming from a company that’s never found a wreck or even a trinket in 15 years, and once claimed they were on “the wreck,” why oh why would anyone be skeptical?

Well, this skeptic would LOVE to see that permit issued, and I will be the first, but certainly not the loudest, to congratulate SFRX if they prove skeptics wrong.

Just a reminder of what you posted yesterday…….

I would think the SeaSearcher data is giving them a reason to stick with the Juno wreck.



Well, duh.

And if nothing’s there I’m sure you’ll engage in more (ahem) intelligent conversation.
icon url

Raider21

09/01/23 8:47 AM

#71333 RE: Goldenboy17 #71322

Quote: These comments from people not associated with the science, planning, organization or actions of SFRX are simply meant to muddy the water or confuse people.
__________________________________

These comments are associated with persons (including myself) who have seen and excavated Spanish Colonial period shipwrecks. The worm poop theory is absolute nonsense. A perfect indisputable example is that of the 1622 'N. S. Atocha and 'Santa Margarita as discovered by Mel Fisher. Have you ever seen the photos of the main hull ballast pile? In the case of the Atocha, the silver bars are in very exposed stacks as are the remnants of the WOODEN chests. It just seems this company thrives on excuses.