InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Ant4

08/28/23 3:57 PM

#15776 RE: Deep Pockets 11 #15775

Deep. I think by offering to fund the development of the assay with + or - $500,000 establishes my belief in the technology. Not proven until the assay is developed but there’s little doubt it is real. Usually we are looking at companies with promising med tech technologies that turn out to be frauds. Nano is not
icon url

yman

08/28/23 4:01 PM

#15777 RE: Deep Pockets 11 #15775

DP11: I understand what your saying but it's been to many years with no funding, no partner, no buyout, no updates, no conformation as to who owns the RAV and N Assay IP and I'm sure much more. Obviously there's a problem and the excuses are stale. Sorry to be contrary but this co is the definition of going dark. I'd like to know who makes up the management of the co. Bret can't do it all as much as he may think he can and no one seems to want to stay. Web site says Bret and Chatterton. I suspect Chattertons involvement is little to none. Opinion only.
icon url

Omar8

08/29/23 6:28 AM

#15778 RE: Deep Pockets 11 #15775

Deep Pockets,




"As far as I understand thru contacts, Brett has been looking for a partner $$, a buyout for a few years.."


A "few" years ? They been looking for a partner a long time and haven't found something decent one yet. So where is the problem at ? Looks to me someone doesn't know how to get it done.
icon url

Omar8

09/06/23 6:07 AM

#15789 RE: Deep Pockets 11 #15775

Dp,


"Yman......... As far as I understand thru contacts, Brett has been looking for a partner $$, a buyout for a few years.......NO takers yet........still trying tho.......ant mans obsession shows maybe a glimmer that there is some value to the Tech'



How do you know he is trying.....any evidence of this trying ?