Let's review a few new fallacies and Hi_Lo lies about GVSI, since his prior 20 fallacies were all fails too.
Hi_Lo’s New Fallacies (Since prior’s 100% inaccurate): - SEC restriction on corporate actions such as a reverse merger. You cannot provide any link that there is a current SEC restriction on GVSI because there isn't. - 6 years of SEC/FINRA requested financials delinquent. Completely meaningless to the Current GVSI - Non SEC registered. Has nothing to do with a merger and they can become an SEC whenever they want. TSNP was an alternative filer and ran over 100,000% - Non SEC reporting. GVSI/Sharp can file to be an SEC filer whenever he wants now. - Non audited financials. And needed right now for what? Is your SFLM an SEC filer? 😂 • In violation of FINRA Rule 6490. You cannot provide any link that there is a current FINRA restriction on GVSI because there isn't. • SEC Rule15c2-11 warning. Soon to change and completely meaningless right now. • Price that has plummeted. Look again 😆 • Accumulation that has plummeted. Price and accumulation is going higher, look at a chart stupid • Problematic share cancelations - 4 losses 0 wins so far. Share cancellations are only an added bonus, Publications are behind GVSI, another fallacy put to bed • Bloated share structure of 7 billion AS and 2.4 billion OS. Authorized shares? LMFAO. Novice bash. TSNP ran over 100,000% with an OS twice as big as GVSI's, LMFAO • No reverse merger candidate to speak of. Again, just another timeline being attacked, yet Sharp tweeted no merger for WNFT, why hasn't he here too then? • A CEO who is abrasive, uncaring about shareholders and occupied with other priorities. LMFAO, but he is 100% doing things right at WNFT because you own it but a fail here? HAHAHAHA!!
Fallacies Fallacies are flawed, deceptive, or false arguments that can be proven wrong with reasoning.
It’s funny, the only GVSI fallacies are timelines again, and trying to address them as “issues” and “will never happen” but they all end up playing out and then those fallacies are quickly forgotten and don’t matter?
I gave several examples of tickers that had a deficiency that got a Name/Ticker Change while Alternate Reporting. You are too ignorant to even acknowledge those facts. You are too dumb to even be putting money into stock tickers. You lose it all the time.
Your constant banter about how one Sharp ticker is good but the others are all bad shows how much of a fool you are with understanding OTC Alternate Reporting Standards. A blatant idiot you are.