InvestorsHub Logo

trunkmonk

08/19/23 10:48 PM

#764279 RE: The Man With No Name #764273

some still have that receivership approach talking about who get paid first, now that is sad.

Donotunderstand

08/20/23 9:38 AM

#764316 RE: The Man With No Name #764273

I own both leaning to JPS
I always felt at 30,000 feet equity is equity (JPS and Common) --- other than the single area of where on an 11 waterfall where JPS are under debt and above common

And yes - common won and did not NEED the so called named BRADFORD JPS exclusive air tight surety that common does not have --- WRONG

now ----- I have not idea - with different dollar numbers and share counts and rules on what is a damage dollar

Did JPS get favored (not just in total) over common or by some pro JPS and anti common logic ------ "the split between winners)

A ton of common - 1B shares --- yet 100M v 500M for fewer JPS

Anyone know exactly - confidently - how the money got divided - by what logic and did such logic afford JPS some "upper hand"

Would be good to know
1. Common that participated won right next to JPS !!!! hurrah
2. Common - even with 1B shares seems to have received less % ??? for some unknown (2 me) reason

Anyone?

stockanalyze

08/20/23 12:18 PM

#764329 RE: The Man With No Name #764273

no one is a hater of anyone, facts speak for themselves, we know what we got from calabria and mnuchin: lots of cnbc interviews with false promises, mnuchin was busy in printing his signature on dollar bills or in last minute middle east trip with kushner, no one has a clue what was he doing there when so much was going on at home and apparently when his boss needed him here. so don't come here and repeat the same thing about our chances. look at the facts, they don't support it. neither party has done anything for making our housing stronger, only weakened by taking out an additional 300 billion from the companies. the companies and loot must be returned in it's entirety.