Replies to post #764194 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[kthomp19]

breach of law cases are the next step, not the old laser focus in supreme court where everyone gets lost in the weeds.

Who is going to file those? You seem to finally have an interest in filing your own lawsuit, otherwise your statement would be mere speculation rather than the fact it is presented as.

If i had much more free equity, i would create a real case and distance myself from the amateur hour of Preferred point of view.

Oh, nevermind. Excuses it is.

actually kinda perverted point of view that promotes everyman for himself and greed.

Acting like this motivation is not equally shared by junior pref and common shareholders is just plain ignorance.

commons just want rule of law, and ownership back that was theirs to begin with

Speak for yourself. The largest common holder, Bill Ackman, is only in it for the money.

Also, the ownership that common shareholders had in June 2008 was NEGATIVE. This post shows that FnF calculated the fair value of their common equity as a negative number as of June 30 2008. If you want that back I'm sure the government would be happy to give it to you.

instead of weird restructuring and capital stack BS, that stems from receivership dreams

You are utterly wrong that restructuring and the capital stack has anything to do with receivership. Those things pertain to an exit from conservatorship also.

focus on breach of law and fraud, people can see this, so can judges

Then go file your own lawsuit or shut up.